De-extinction didn't live up to the hype.

  • Published In: New Scientist, 2025, v. 268, n. 3573/3574. P. 24 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Le Page, Michael 3 of 3

Abstract

The article critiques Colossal Biosciences' claims of successfully reviving extinct species, specifically the dire wolf (Aenocyon dirus). While the company asserts it has brought back the dire wolf through genetic modifications of grey wolf (Canis lupus) cells, experts argue that the changes made are minimal and do not result in a true revival of the extinct species. Critics, including biologists from various institutions, express concern that such claims may mislead the public and detract from conservation efforts for endangered species. Additionally, there are allegations of a smear campaign against those who challenge Colossal's assertions, raising ethical questions about the implications of genetic engineering in conservation. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:New Scientist. 2025/12, Vol. 268, Issue 3573/3574, p24
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Health and Medicine
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0262-4079
  • DOI:10.1016/s0262-4079(25)02022-6
  • Accession Number:189928540
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of New Scientist is the property of New Scientist Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.