JOURNAL ARTICLE

Replication across O6-methylguanine activates futile cycling of DNA mismatch repair attempts assisted by the chromatin-remodelling enzyme Smarcad1.

  • Published In: Journal of Biochemistry, 2025, v. 177, n. 4. P. 247 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Shigenobu-Ueno, Karin; Sakamoto, Reihi; Kanatsu, Eiichiro; Kawasoe, Yoshitaka; Takahashi, Tatsuro S 3 of 3

Abstract

This article focuses on the mechanistic investigation of futile mismatch repair (MMR) cycling induced by O6-methylguanine (meG) lesions during DNA replication in a chromatin context. Using replication-competent Xenopus egg extracts, the study demonstrates that meG–T mispairs, but not meG–C pairs, efficiently activate MMR, leading to iterative cycles of strand excision and resynthesis on the nascent strand, consistent with the futile cycling model. The research further shows that replication across meG-containing DNA generates persistent single-strand breaks on the daughter strand and that the chromatin remodeler Smarcad1 facilitates the retention of these breaks, thereby assisting futile MMR cycling. These findings provide experimental evidence that chromatin replication across meG lesions induces damage-promoting futile MMR cycling, with Smarcad1 playing a supportive role in this process.

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Biochemistry. 2025/04, Vol. 177, Issue 4, p247
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Health and Medicine
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0021-924X
  • DOI:10.1093/jb/mvaf007
  • Accession Number:184348230
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Biochemistry is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.