JOURNAL ARTICLE

Longitudinal Feasibility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in Non-Demented ALS Patients.

  • Published In: European Neurology, 2024, v. 87, n. 2. P. 79 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Aiello, Edoardo Nicolò; Solca, Federica; Torre, Silvia; Colombo, Eleonora; Maranzano, Alessio; De Lorenzo, Alberto; Patisso, Valerio; Treddenti, Mauro; Curti, Beatrice; Morelli, Claudia; Doretti, Alberto; Verde, Federico; Ferrucci, Roberta; Barbieri, Sergio; Ruggiero, Fabiana; Priori, Alberto; Silani, Vincenzo; Ticozzi, Nicola; Poletti, Barbara 3 of 3

Abstract

Introduction: The present study aimed at testing the longitudinal feasibility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in an Italian cohort of non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. Methods:N = 39 non-demented ALS patients were followed-up at a 5-to-10-month interval (M = 6.8; SD = 1.4) with the MoCA and the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). Practice effects, test-retest reliability, and predictive validity (against follow-up ECAS scores) were assessed. Reliable change indices (RCIs) were derived via a regression-based approach by accounting for retest interval and baseline confounders (i.e., demographics, disease duration, and severity and progression rate). Results: At retest, 100% and 69.2% of patients completed the ECAS and the MoCA, respectively. Patients who could not complete the MoCA showed a slightly more severe and fast-progressing disease. The MoCA was not subject to practice effects (t[32] = −0.80; p = 0.429) and was reliable at retest (intra-class correlation = 0.82). Moreover, baseline MoCA scores predicted the ECAS at retest. RCIs were successfully derived – with baseline MoCA scores being the only significant predictor of retest performances (ps < 0.001). Conclusions: As long as motor disabilities do not undermine its applicability, the MoCA appears to be longitudinally feasible at a 5-to-10-month interval in non-demented ALS patients. However, ALS-specific screeners – such as the ECAS – should be preferred whenever possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:European Neurology. 2024/03, Vol. 87, Issue 2, p79
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Health and Medicine
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0014-3022
  • DOI:10.1159/000538828
  • Accession Number:178030187
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of European Neurology is the property of Karger AG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.