JOURNAL ARTICLE
Graft Choice for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Superior Tendon-to-Bone Incorporation With Soft-tissue Autograft Compared With Allograft and Hybrid Graft in a Rat Model.
Published In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2026, v. 54, n. 2. P. 285 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Zhou, Hao; Liu, Rui; Liu, Yu; Bo, Xusheng; Liu, Hao; Yang, Siqi; Li, Zhikuan; Shen, Kai; Song, Huanghe; Guo, Dunming; Gu, Xiaoyuan; Yin, Guoyong; Lee, Chien-Wei; Wang Qing; Dong, Jiangtao; Xu, Hongtao 3 of 3
Abstract
This article focuses on comparing autograft, allograft, and hybrid grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a rat model to evaluate tendon-to-bone healing, biomechanical performance, and functional recovery. The study found that autografts demonstrated superior histological integration, enhanced vascularization, greater new bone formation, and improved biomechanical strength and gait function compared with allografts and hybrid grafts. Allografts and hybrid grafts showed delayed remodeling, increased inflammation, necrosis, and inferior mechanical properties, with hybrid grafts performing intermediate between autografts and allografts. These preclinical findings support the clinical preference for autografts in ACLR and suggest caution when considering allograft or hybrid grafts, highlighting the need for further human studies to validate these results.
Additional Information
- Source:American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026/02, Vol. 54, Issue 2, p285
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Health and Medicine
- Publication Date:2026
- ISSN:0363-5465
- DOI:10.1177/03635465251403553
- Accession Number:191254629
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of American Journal of Sports Medicine is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.