Exploring the use and usability of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) 'Evidence in your inbox' e‐mail alert service.
Published In: Health Information & Libraries Journal, 2025, v. 42, n. 4. P. 548 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Wong, Jeremy Joelin; Sharma, Sweekriti; Wong, Alfred; Moseley, Anne M.; Ilhan, Emre 3 of 3
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the use and useability of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database's 'Evidence in your inbox' e‐mail alert service. Materials and Methods: An explanatory sequential design consisting of a usage evaluation, cross‐sectional survey, and semi‐structured interviews. Usage was evaluated using routinely collected data from October 2015 to March 2021: number of subscribers, number of articles, open rates, and click‐through rates. Subscribers were subdivided by level of engagement. All subscribers were invited to participate in a 17‐question online survey. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with a subgroup of participants who completed the survey. Results: The service sent a minimum of 121 or a maximum of 431 articles, on average, each month across 15 feeds to 16,556 subscribers. Overtime, the rate of opening and clicking on links within e‐mails decreased. Low engagers (62%) subscribed to 3.5 (95% CI 3.7–3.4) more feeds than high engagers (23%) and 2.8 (95% CI 3.0–2.6) more than moderate engagers (15%). Seventy‐one subscribers completed the survey, 89% of whom were satisfied with the service and who thought it was an efficient way to be updated on evidence (98%). Six subscribers participated in semi‐structured interviews. Thematic analysis of interviews identified five facilitators and four barriers to using the service, with three potential solutions to aid useability. Discussion and Conclusion: The format and structure of the service may facilitate its use and usability. Addressing barriers of having too few or too many articles, and lack of time to read full articles may enhance the usability of 'Evidence in your inbox'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2025/12, Vol. 42, Issue 4, p548
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Health and Medicine
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:1471-1834
- DOI:10.1111/hir.12559
- Accession Number:191073927
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Health Information & Libraries Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.