JOURNAL ARTICLE
High-sensitivity neonatal urine drug testing has similar positivity rates to meconium for detecting in utero exposure to methamphetamine and cocaine.
Published In: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2024, v. 48, n. 2. P. 99 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Brown, Hannah M; Roper, Stephen M; Dietzen, Dennis J; Crews, Bridgit O 3 of 3
Abstract
This article evaluates the effectiveness of a rapid, sensitive liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS-MS) method for neonatal urine drug testing compared to standard meconium testing in 1,424 neonates. The study found that urine testing using LC–MS-MS demonstrated equivalent sensitivity to meconium testing for detecting in utero exposure to cocaine and methamphetamine, while meconium testing showed higher positivity rates for cannabinoids and opiates. Urine testing offers advantages including faster turnaround times and easier specimen collection, which may facilitate more timely clinical decisions. The findings suggest that sensitive LC–MS-MS urine testing can be a valuable tool in neonatal drug exposure screening, though limitations include lower detection of certain drugs like cannabinoids and the exclusion of synthetic opioids such as fentanyl from the comparison.
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 2024/03, Vol. 48, Issue 2, p99
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Health and Medicine
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:0146-4760
- DOI:10.1093/jat/bkad085
- Accession Number:175801113
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Analytical Toxicology is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.