JOURNAL ARTICLE
Is the fundamental pathology in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy caused by a failure of glycogenolysis–glycolysis in costameres?
Published In: Journal of Genetics, 2023, v. 102, n. 1. P. 1 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Nesari, Vishakha; Balakrishnan, Suresh; Nongthomba, Upendra 3 of 3
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the most common form of progressive childhood muscular dystrophy associated with weakness of limbs, loss of ambulation, heart weakness and early death. The mutations causing either loss-of-expression or function of the full-length protein dystrophin (Dp427) from the DMD gene are responsible for the disease pathology. Dp427 forms a part of the large dystroglycan complex, called DAPC, in the sarcolemma, and its absence derails muscle contraction. Muscle biopsies from DMD patients show an overactivation of excitation-contraction-coupling (ECC) activable calcium incursion, sarcolemmal ROS production, NHE1 activation, IL6 secretion, etc. The signalling pathways, like Akt/PBK, STAT3, p38MAPK, and ERK1/2, are also hyperactive in DMD. These pathways are responsible for post-mitotic trophic growth and metabolic adaptation, in response to exercise in healthy muscles, but cause atrophy and cell death in dystrophic muscles. We hypothesize that the metabolic background of repressed glycolysis in DMD, as opposed to excess glycolysis seen in cancers or healthy contracting muscles, changes the outcome of these 'growth pathways'. The reduced glycolysis has been considered a secondary outcome of the cytoskeletal disruptions seen in DMD. Given the cytoskeleton-crosslinking ability of the glycolytic enzymes, we hypothesize that the failure of glycogenolytic and glycolytic enzymes to congregate is the primary pathology, which then affects the subsarcolemmal cytoskeletal organization in costameres and initiates the pathophysiology associated with DMD, giving rise to the tissue-specific differences in disease progression between muscle, heart and brain. The lacunae in the regulation of the key components of the hypothesized metabolome, and the limitations of this theory are deliberated. The considerations for developing future therapies based on known pathological processes are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Genetics. 2023/06, Vol. 102, Issue 1, p1
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Health and Medicine
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0022-1333
- DOI:10.1007/s12041-022-01410-w
- Accession Number:161301151
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Genetics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.