"Nature Still": Second Nature in Bacon and Pope.
Published In: Eighteenth-Century Studies, 2025, v. 58, n. 3. P. 337 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Hushagen, Sam 3 of 3
Abstract
Recent scholarship under the heading "distributed cognition" advances the thesis that human thinking extends beyond the confines of the skull to incorporate tools, technologies, and the built environment. This scholarship defines itself in opposition to the classical view of intellection descending from Descartes, according to which the mind exists prior to mediating technologies and environmental scaffolding and exercises executive function over these subordinates. This essay argues that Francis Bacon and Alexander Pope embrace similarly technical and infrastructural views of human thought, and challenges the tendency to equate distributed cognition with distributed agency. While New Materialism, Actor Network Theory, and other Latour-adjacent projects have challenged historical divisions of subject and object, those versions of distributed agency ignore important distinctions between things and persons and overlook the specifically "second natured" competencies that Bacon and Pope help to see. Long assumed to belong to the classical picture of cognition, Bacon and Pope challenge the long-standing opposition of natural and artificial through an account of "second nature," according to which historically accumulated cultural practices extend from and exist on a continuum with bare human nature, and the material world. By drawing on recent accounts of "second nature" in philosophy of mind and cognitive science, I explain how second nature is "Nature still, but Nature methodized." [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Eighteenth-Century Studies. 2025/04, Vol. 58, Issue 3, p337
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:History
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:0013-2586
- DOI:10.1353/ecs.2024.a958727
- Accession Number:185689606
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Eighteenth-Century Studies is the property of Johns Hopkins University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.