JOURNAL ARTICLE

Overwhelming Perfection: A Defense of Addison's Account of the Sublime.

  • Published In: Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, 2025, v. 83, n. 2. P. 141 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Harbin, R Kathleen 3 of 3

Abstract

This article focuses on Joseph Addison's account of the sublime, arguing that his historically influential view—that sublime experience is pleasurable because it overwhelms the imagination with vast, perfect content suited to human faculties—offers a compelling alternative to dominant theories that characterize sublimity as a mixed experience involving both pleasure and pain. Addison’s conception denies that fear or negative affect is necessary to the sublime, instead emphasizing that overwhelming immensity can be experienced as pure joy. The article situates Addison’s theory within contemporary philosophical and psychological research, noting that recent empirical studies often fail to find consistent evidence of fear in sublime experiences and that sublimity aligns with an aesthetic form of awe. By integrating Addison’s perspective, the article addresses challenges faced by mixed-valence accounts and supports a broader understanding of sublime experience as intensely pleasurable and cognitively engaging without requiring negative emotions.

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism. 2025/04, Vol. 83, Issue 2, p141
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0021-8529
  • DOI:10.1093/jaac/kpaf013
  • Accession Number:186726831
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.