JOURNAL ARTICLE
Obtaining the "Main Keys to Wisdom": Distinguishing "Damages" from other Pecuniary Remedies in Scots Law.
Published In: Edinburgh Law Review, 2023, v. 27, n. 1. P. 77 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Brown, Jonathan 3 of 3
Abstract
This article focuses on clarifying the taxonomy of pecuniary judicial remedies in Scots private law, arguing against the common practice of using "damages" as a catch-all term for monetary awards. It distinguishes four distinct remedies: "damages" for pecuniary loss arising from damnum iniuria (wrongful damage), "solatium" for non-patrimonial affronts based on iniuria (injury to personal rights), "assythment" (a term the author suggests reviving) for pain and suffering, and "violent profits" for unlawful dispossession related to proprietary rights. The article emphasizes that Scots law's civilian foundation and Roman law influences create a different conceptual framework from the Anglo-American common law system, where "damages" broadly covers all monetary remedies. It concludes that precise terminology and recognition of these separate remedies are essential for conceptual clarity and effective comparative legal research.
Additional Information
- Source:Edinburgh Law Review. 2023/01, Vol. 27, Issue 1, p77
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:History
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:1364-9809
- DOI:10.3366/elr.2023.0811
- Accession Number:161361021
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.