JOURNAL ARTICLE
Chapter 11 Sacred Places and Contested Spaces in Maine: The Long Shadow of Colonial Science in the Light of Repatriation.
Published In: Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 2023, v. 34, n. 1. P. 132 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Wheeler, Ryan J.; Newsom, Bonnie 3 of 3
Abstract
The Nevin site in Maine has become a contested space as Wabanaki people seeking to repatriate their ancestors confront archaeologists who adhere to the antiquated postulates of their predecessors. Warren K. Moorehead, of Phillips Academy's archaeology department, focused field work on Maine's so‐called "Red Paint" cemeteries from 1912–1920. Moorehead acknowledged the antiquity of the cemeteries but saw the people as members of a "lost civilization" culturally distinct from later Indigenous groups. Douglas Byers succeeded Moorehead and excavated graves at the Nevin site from 1936–1940. Despite radiocarbon dates and a better understanding of the Archaic period, Byers did not attribute Nevin's lavish grave goods to that early era. The confusion sowed by Moorehead and Byers still influences contemporary archaeologists and museum personnel who resist Wabanaki efforts to repatriate their ancestors under contemporary legislation. Despite the lack of robust research on in‐migration, prevailing ideas about the Late Archaic in Maine envision a population replacement by southern immigrants. This hypothesis opposes claims of cultural connectedness by contemporary Wabanaki peoples. Here, we explore the archaeological legacy associated with the Nevin cemetery and challenge archaeologists to confront colonialist science that permeates repatriation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association. 2023/07, Vol. 34, Issue 1, p132
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:History
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:1551-823X
- DOI:10.1111/apaa.12166
- Accession Number:169726788
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.