JOURNAL ARTICLE

A Plantation Illogic: Narrating Proslavery's Imagined Futures.

  • Published In: American Literary History, 2023, v. 35, n. 4. P. 1587 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Hughes, Tomos 3 of 3

Abstract

This article examines the temporal and narrative dimensions of speculative proslavery thought in the nineteenth century, focusing on how proslavery political economy articulated a vision of capitalist modernity distinct from liberal national futurity. It analyzes literary works by Edgar Allan Poe, Nathaniel Beverley Tucker, and Edmund Ruffin, arguing that proslavery imaginaries are marked by exhaustion and an inability to envision a progressive future beyond the plantation's limits. Proslavery theorists like Thomas Roderick Dew and Tucker framed slavery as central to capitalist social reproduction, yet their speculative visions reveal a tension between slavery as a universal economic logic and the plantation's spatial and temporal constraints. The article suggests that this impasse challenges dominant narratives that depict slavery's relationship to modernity solely as a disavowed foundation of capitalism, instead highlighting slavery's role in producing a stalled, exhausted futurity that resonates with contemporary critiques of racial capitalism's crises.

Additional Information

  • Source:American Literary History. 2023/12, Vol. 35, Issue 4, p1587
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:0896-7148
  • DOI:10.1093/alh/ajad153
  • Accession Number:173831854
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of American Literary History is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.