JOURNAL ARTICLE
Settling the Score of the Cultural Revolution: The Trial of Lin Biao and Jiang Qing.
Published In: American Journal of Chinese Studies, 2025, v. 32, n. 2. P. 103 1 of 3
Database: Historical Abstracts with Full Text 2 of 3
Authored By: Jin Qiu 3 of 3
Abstract
The Chinese Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) was the most turbulent event in the history of the People's Republic of China. As yet no firm statistics are available concerning the human losses during the Cultural Revolution. A recent article suggests that the number could be as high as two million, although so far there is no way to verify this figure. In addition to the massive number of deaths, more people suffered from harassment in the form of imprisonment, physical and psychological abuse, and economic difficulties, such as relocation or unemployment due to political reasons. This paper examines the measurements that the post-Mao government employed to handle the public grievances of the Cultural Revolution, focusing on the trial of Lin Biao and Jiang Qing counter-revolutionary cliques in 1980-81. The trial, on one hand, served as the party's apology to the Chinese people, and many victims of the Cultural Revolution were vindicated afterward. It helped stabilize the situation and consolidate the power of Deng's government upon the closing of the old chapter. The trial, on the other hand, was also an embarrassment to that government from the legal point of view. One important legacy of the trial, however, is the creation of the official myth of the Cultural Revolution, which claims that Lin Biao and jiang Qing, rather than Mao, were responsible for the disastrous Cultural Revolution. This official verdict has dominated the discourse of the Cultural Revolution until today. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:American Journal of Chinese Studies. 2025/10, Vol. 32, Issue 2, p103
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:History
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:0742-5929
- Accession Number:188892706
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of American Journal of Chinese Studies is the property of American Journal of Chinese Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.