Back

The Curse of Ham.

  • Published In: History Today, 2025, v. 75, n. 10. P. 16 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Almond, Philip C. 3 of 3

Abstract

The article examines the transformation of the biblical narrative surrounding Noah's sons—Shem, Ham, and Japheth—after the Flood and its implications for racial classifications and justifications of slavery. Initially, the descendants of these sons were associated with different regions: Shem with Asia, Ham with Africa, and Japheth with Europe. Over time, this classification evolved from geographical to racial terms, contributing to the development of modern racism and the concept of the "curse of Ham," which was misinterpreted to justify the enslavement of African peoples. By the late 19th century, as skepticism about the biblical account grew, the curse's use as a justification for slavery diminished, although racism persisted through other means. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:History Today. 2025/10, Vol. 75, Issue 10, p16
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0018-2753
  • Accession Number:187799551
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of History Today is the property of History Today Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.