JOURNAL ARTICLE
THE DYNAMICS OF TECHNOLOGICAL SPECTACLE IN BILLY MITCHELL'S CAMPAIGN FOR AERIAL WAR.
Published In: Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 2024, v. 27, n. 1. P. 27 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: FIRGENS, BENJAMIN 3 of 3
Abstract
This essay examines the first major American debate over aerial warfare as a case study in the relationship between visual spectacle and warfighting technologies. In the early 1920s, Brigadier General William "Billy" Mitchell mounted a short but intense advocacy campaign to win public approval for a standalone and fully supported air force. He justified his arguments with sanitized depictions of the warplane's idealized deployment. I call such depictions technological spectacles, and I parse their three hallmarks in Mitchell's advocacy: the dissociation of violence and destruction, the self-justification of technology, and the confusion of possibility for probability. I demonstrate that these habits of spectacle pervaded not only Mitchell's rhetoric but the coverage he received in the press. The essay establishes Mitchell as a key figure in the history of American rhetoric about military technology and, in the process, offers new historical context and critical vocabulary for diagnosing rhetorics of technological spectacle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Rhetoric & Public Affairs. 2024/03, Vol. 27, Issue 1, p27
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:History
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:1094-8392
- DOI:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.27.1.0027
- Accession Number:179727956
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Rhetoric & Public Affairs is the property of Michigan State University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.