JOURNAL ARTICLE
Experiencing Buddhist practices promotes nonbelievers' preference for future rewards in intertemporal choices.
Published In: European Journal of Social Psychology, 2023, v. 53, n. 1. P. 230 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Wang, Ziyi; Chen, Cheng; Mo, Jian; Lu, Fan; Ma, Jiatao; Chen, Chuansheng; He, Guibing 3 of 3
Abstract
Religious individuals often prefer future rewards more in intertemporal decision‐making than nonreligious individuals, but the reasons behind this preference remain under‐investigated. Focusing on decision‐making in Buddhist culture, the current study aimed to examine three potential mechanisms: Buddhist practices, self‐control and belief in future‐oriented concepts. In five studies, we consistently found that nonbelievers' preference ratings for Larger and Later (LL) options increased after visiting a temple (Study 1, n = 99) or participating in Buddha name chanting (Studies 2–5, n = 314). We also found in Studies 3 and 4 that this effect was mediated by the individual's level of self‐control, but no evidence was found to support the mediation of belief in future‐oriented concepts. These results contribute to the work attesting to the effect of religious practices on individuals (especially nonbelievers). They also provide a mechanism (self‐control) for the positive correlation between individuals' religiousness and preference for future rewards in intertemporal decision‐making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:European Journal of Social Psychology. 2023/02, Vol. 53, Issue 1, p230
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:History
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0046-2772
- DOI:10.1002/ejsp.2900
- Accession Number:161471372
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of European Journal of Social Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.