The Public Sphere as a Common Good: The Militant Farmer Karsthans (1521) and the Dialogue Pamphlet as Media Genre.

  • Published In: Substance: A Review of Theory & Literary Criticism, 2024, v. 53, n. 3. P. 25 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Widder, Roman 3 of 3

Abstract

This article reflects on the dynamics of the public sphere in the early modern period by analyzing the figure of the peasant and the notion of the common(s) in dialogue pamphlets. Beginning with a discussion of what it means to speak of a public sphere in relation to the early modern period it examines one of the most famous Reformation dialogues Karst-hans published anonymously in 1521 in Strasbourg. Just before the German Peasants' War (1524–26) the Lutheran dialogue polemically directed against the theologian and satirist Thomas Murner positions the peasant as a critically mature citizen with the hoe (Karst) symbolizing his potential militancy. This article specifically draws on the notion of publicity that the dialogue articulates. Using it as an example this article analyzes the transitions and mutual projections between fiction urban culture and peasant protest the structures of which are significant for the literary representation of agrarian protest far beyond the Reformation. In its final section this article closely examines the media genre of the dialogue pamphlet and outlines some horizons of its historical development up to the Enlightenment concerning its political use and its relation to the ideal of a dialogic and socially leveled public sphere. By arguing that there existed an implicit ideal of the public sphere as a common good in the early modern period the aim is also to clarify what distinguishes this early modern understanding of the public sphere from its conceptualization as a marketplace that has dominated our understanding of it since the Enlightenment. The prehistory presented here should provide resources for reimagining the future of the public sphere at a time when its actual structure is once again very much at stake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Substance: A Review of Theory & Literary Criticism. 2024/09, Vol. 53, Issue 3, p25
  • Document Type:Literary Criticism
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0049-2426
  • DOI:10.1353/sub.2024.a944506
  • Accession Number:181087581
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Substance: A Review of Theory & Literary Criticism is the property of Johns Hopkins University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.