The 1990s party realignment of U.S. presidential elections: Geographic sorting of counties by blue or red.

  • Published In: Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2023, v. 104, n. 4. P. 636 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Aistrup, Joseph A.; Mahato, Binita; Morris, John C. 3 of 3

Abstract

Introduction: This paper addresses the issue of partisan polarization in the U.S. in presidential voting at the county level. The literature on the growing partisan sorting and/or polarization is extensive, and controversies are pervasive. This paper focuses on the timing and sequence of changes in partisan vote shares at the county level from 1952 through the 2020 election. Methods: We apply confirmatory factor analysis to identify the structures of partisan competition in counties from 1952 to 2020, and multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) to uncover the social processes that influence the growing partisan polarization in the U.S. Results: We find that the growing partisan segregation coincides with the beginning of a secular change in the structure of partisan competition at the presidential level among counties that has intensified over the past quarter century. Polarization, segregation of partisans in communities, and a rise in sectionalism are the predominant characteristics of this new alignment. Conclusion: This study confirms a secular realignment in the structure of party competition among counties in presidential elections starting in 1996 and solidifying in 2008 when Obama is elected. The segregation of counties by dark shades of red or blue is the unique fingerprint of this new alignment that we call the "Geographic Sort" alignment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell). 2023/07, Vol. 104, Issue 4, p636
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:0038-4941
  • DOI:10.1111/ssqu.13288
  • Accession Number:164935736
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.