JOURNAL ARTICLE

Revolt and Revolution: On the Political Mobilization of the Peasant in Georg Büchner's "The Hessian Messenger" (1834).

  • Published In: Substance: A Review of Theory & Literary Criticism, 2024, v. 53, n. 3. P. 49 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Schildmann, Mareike 3 of 3

Abstract

This article takes Georg Büchner's pamphlet "The Hessian Messenger" written in 1834 in collaboration with the theologian and revolutionist Friedrich Weidig as a starting point to explore the literary forms of peasant agitation and mobilization in the context of the German Vormärz (c. 1830–1848). Against the background of the conceptualization of the peasant as a genuinely conservative and anti-revolutionary force in the theory of the mid-19th century elaborated by such different thinkers like Karl Marx and Wilhelm Heinrich Riehl this article focuses on the possibilities that writers of the radical and progressive opposition like Büchner opened for the integration of peasants into the (liberal) revolutionary project. What is the function of literature in negotiating the political agency of the peasant and what literary forms aesthetics and strategies does it generate to portray and influence the peasant's perspective on the political conflicts of its time? In a close textual analysis I explore how by implementing specific rhetorical means (statistics agrarian references biblical narratives) the text first places the peasant world and the interests and problems of the rural population at the center of its argumentation. Second I show how the pamphlet connects the disclosure of the peasants' social and economic grievances inevitably with a discussion of the constitution and the institution of the state. The abstract liberal question of human rights is thus derived directly from power relations and economic exploitation in the countryside. By referring to those seemingly traditional 'characteristics' of the peasant which until then and later influenced the dominant image of the peasant as conservative that Büchner and Weidig were able to constitute the peasant as a political powerful collective and revolutionary disruptive force. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Substance: A Review of Theory & Literary Criticism. 2024/09, Vol. 53, Issue 3, p49
  • Document Type:Literary Criticism
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0049-2426
  • DOI:10.1353/sub.2024.a944507
  • Accession Number:181087582
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Substance: A Review of Theory & Literary Criticism is the property of Johns Hopkins University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.