Literacy, National Identity, and Affective Economies in the 2022 Philippine Presidential Election.
Published In: Journal of Information Ethics, 2024, v. 33, n. 2. P. 84 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Caparas, Francesca "Chesa" 3 of 3
Abstract
After the 2016 Philippine presidential election, Facebook's Public Policy Director for Global Elections labeled the Philippines as "Patient Zero" in the war on disinformation. Despite this stark warning, things had not changed by the next election. In 2022 Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos, Jr., was elected president amidst widespread accounts that his campaign engaged in online disinformation and historical distortion about Philippine history, specifically the martial law period. Through appeals to national identity, Marcos mobilized deep emotional attachments, and the ability of these messages to circulate on social media illustrated what Sara Ahmed has called an "affective economy." By looking at the way affect circulated on social media during the 2022 election, this paper will explore how addressing disinformation requires understanding social media's ability to capitalize on emotion. Furthermore, this paper argues that effective media and information literacy campaigns need to interrogate the colonial roots of social media's affective economy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Information Ethics. 2024/09, Vol. 33, Issue 2, p84
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:History
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:1061-9321
- DOI:10.2307/JIE.33.2.84
- Accession Number:183478736
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Information Ethics is the property of McFarland & Company, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.