JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Effect of Referendums on Autocratic Survival: Running Alone and Not Finishing Second.

  • Published In: Government & Opposition, 2024, v. 59, n. 2. P. 405 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Penadés, Alberto; Velasco, Sergio 3 of 3

Abstract

Dictatorships that use plebiscites – that is, referendums initiated by the executive – have a longer expected lifespan. A successful plebiscite sends a signal that makes coordination for collective action more difficult and induces the falsification of preferences. It also enhances the status of the dictator within the regime and against potential rivals through the use of agenda power. As a result, plebiscites are followed by decreased mobilization and a reduced risk of palace coups. This, in turn, adds years to the dictator's tenure. We have found evidence to support these propositions by utilizing data from various databases of autocratic regimes that span from 1946 to 2008. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Government & Opposition. 2024/04, Vol. 59, Issue 2, p405
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0017-257X
  • DOI:10.1017/gov.2023.31
  • Accession Number:175919007
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Government & Opposition is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.