JOURNAL ARTICLE

Impossible Labour History: Solidarity Dreams and Antiblack Subsumption.

  • Published In: Oxford Literary Review, 2024, v. 46, n. 1. P. 49 1 of 3

  • Database: Humanities Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Sorentino, Sara-Maria 3 of 3

Abstract

Labour, for capitalist critique, is not just slavery analogised; it is slavery materialised and expanded. Across the Marxist terrain, class struggle is presupposed by the struggle not to be a slave: the struggle of 'the worker' combats a slavery simultaneously more complex, because it is more mediated, and implicitly more emancipatory, because it materialises what has been called 'objective possibility'. In this article, I track symptoms of the sublation of slavery by labour in the telling of 'new labour history' and counter with 'objective impossibility' as a more open and efficacious diagnostic for the slave's political position. Though the sentences of United States labour history are alive with promises of solidarity, the field also remains an unstable landmine of antagonism, death, failure, limit. I argue that this labour history, despite its gestures towards the problem 'race', is grammatically caught in a web of desires that Sylvia Wynter names 'the hegemony of the labour conceptual frame (i.e., the frame of the struggle against capitalism)'. The labour conceptual frame is hegemonic because the relation between race and class already presupposes a latent Marxist orientation to subjects, objects, consciousness, and history that renders perfect the slave's objective impossibility and culminates, at the nexus of race and class, in an uncritical conversion of labour's objective possibility into pure, unmediated possibility. This article tracks how the black worker remains stubbornly impossible throughout this theoretical convergence, bending the apparatus of labour history, the purchase of Marxist theory, and the salience of class-first politics through the excess of blackness to labour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Oxford Literary Review. 2024/07, Vol. 46, Issue 1, p49
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:03051498
  • DOI:10.3366/olr.2024.0428
  • Accession Number:178092364
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Oxford Literary Review is the property of Edinburgh University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.