JOURNAL ARTICLE

Explaining State Allocation Shares Under the Water Quality Act of 1987: Politics, Incrementalism, or Need?

  • Published In: Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2025, v. 55, n. 2. P. 353 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Morris, John C.; Aistrup, Joseph; Nemerever, Zoe; Zhang, Xiodan 3 of 3

Abstract

The article examines the basis for the allocation of federal funding for wastewater treatment infrastructure under the Water Quality Act (WQA) of 1987, which replaced the previous Clean Water Act (CWA) grant program with a state-administered revolving loan fund model. Unlike earlier transparent allocation formulas based on state population and water quality needs, the 1987 WQA included a fixed allocation table with undisclosed methodology, introducing minimum funding shares that primarily benefited small-population states. Through regression analysis, the study finds that incrementalism best explains the 1987 allocations, with small states receiving disproportionately higher shares, while committee membership and partisanship had no significant effect. The findings highlight the opaque political bargaining behind the funding formula and underscore the importance of revisiting allocation methods as state populations and water quality needs have shifted substantially since 1987.

Additional Information

  • Source:Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 2025/04, Vol. 55, Issue 2, p353
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0048-5950
  • DOI:10.1093/publius/pjae045
  • Accession Number:185678710
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Publius: The Journal of Federalism is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.