JOURNAL ARTICLE
Gareth Evans responds.
Published In: Australian Foreign Affairs, 2026, n. 26. P. 101 1 of 2
Database: Political Science Complete 2 of 2
Abstract
The article focuses on the debate surrounding nuclear weapons, particularly the perspectives of Gareth Evans and his responses to critiques from Alex Bristow, Melissa Parke, and Allan Behm. Evans emphasizes the existential risks posed by nuclear weapons and advocates for nuclear arms control, including the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) and a No First Use (NFU) policy. He argues against the notion of limited nuclear war and critiques the exaggerated perception of the threat posed by China, asserting that maintaining a first-use option is dangerous and could lead to miscalculations and escalation. Evans concludes that the risks of nuclear weapons far outweigh their perceived benefits, highlighting the need for a shift in focus towards nuclear risk reduction. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:Australian Foreign Affairs. 2026/02, Issue 26, p101
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:History
- Publication Date:2026
- ISSN:2208-5912
- Accession Number:191681619
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Australian Foreign Affairs is the property of Schwartz Books Pty Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.