Impact of conflict on sustainable agricultural practices and transitions in Cambodia.

  • Published In: Culture, Agriculture, Food & Environment, 2024, v. 46, n. 2. P. 56 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Pekarcik Carter, Gracie; Ader, David; Gill, Tom 3 of 3

Abstract

Cambodian social and economic systems are in an era of transformation as the nation transitions from its history of war and tragedy into a future shaped by more democratic institutions and free market policies. During the 1970s, under the Khmer Rouge, the people of Cambodia were forced to live communally and survive through collective agriculture. Starvation, hard labor, knowledge destruction, and summary execution resulted in a nation facing high levels of poverty, intellectual loss, and food insecurity. Today, while strides have been made to increase economic and social outcomes, the predominantly rural country is still characterized by a weak educational system and economic dependence on agriculture. To better understand the role of the Khmer Rouge era on agriculture, a qualitative comparative case study analysis of Cambodian agriculture pre‐ and post‐Pol Pot regime was conducted. Results indicate that the Khmer Rouge reduced labor availability, stunted rice production output, collectivized and centralized farming systems, intensified production, and created an overall loss of crop diversity and knowledge. It is necessary to understand the influence that the conflict had on Cambodian agricultural systems to assure the nation is able to transition from an unsustainable, extensification‐based agriculture system to a diverse, sustainably intensified agricultural landscape. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Culture, Agriculture, Food & Environment. 2024/12, Vol. 46, Issue 2, p56
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:2153-9553
  • DOI:10.1111/cuag.12324
  • Accession Number:181948132
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Culture, Agriculture, Food & Environment is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.