JOURNAL ARTICLE

Monetary Gold Principle and the Case of Nicaragua v. Germany.

  • Published In: Chinese Journal of International Law, 2024, v. 23, n. 2. P. 387 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Trivedi, Abhishek 3 of 3

Abstract

This document explores the potential application of the Monetary Gold Principle (MGP) in the Nicaragua v. Germany case before the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It argues that the MGP may not be relevant in this case because Germany's obligations are separate from Israel's actions and are based on Germany's knowledge of potential violations of international humanitarian law. The document also suggests that the MGP may not be applicable at the stage of ordering provisional measures, as its purpose is to determine the admissibility of the case. Ultimately, the ICJ has the discretion to decide whether or not to apply the MGP in this particular case. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Chinese Journal of International Law. 2024/06, Vol. 23, Issue 2, p387
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:1540-1650
  • DOI:10.1093/chinesejil/jmae016
  • Accession Number:178650482
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Chinese Journal of International Law is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.