JOURNAL ARTICLE

Democratizing Education, Adjusting Students: Occupation Reform, Pupil Guidance, and the Discourse of Tekio in Postwar Japan.

  • Published In: History of Education Quarterly, 2024, v. 64, n. 4. P. 457 1 of 3

  • Database: Education Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Shorb, Patrick Naoya 3 of 3

Abstract

The Occupation of Japan (1945-1952) sought to democratize the nation's education system; pupil guidance was expected to play a key part of this process. American reformers promoted new guidance practices (e.g., the comprehensive collection of students' personal data, guidance interventions based on the case-study method, an expanded homeroom curriculum) that emphasized the psychological adjustment —translated as tekio (適応)—of students to school and society in a new Japan. By tracing the evolution of prewar and postwar Japanese guidance discourse, this study examines how American pupil guidance's emphasis on student adjustment interacted with, and transformed, twentieth-century Japanese education. Drawing from prewar, Occupation-era and post-independence sources, the essay explores three points. First, by comparing prewar life guidance with Occupation-era and post-independence pupil guidance , it emphasizes the important changes effected by tekio -oriented guidance during the late 1940s. Second, by examining the way these practices related to Occupation's educational democratization, it explores how their psychological approach to democracy defined—and arguably constrained—the dynamism of this broader project. Lastly, the work discusses who supported and opposed this new tekio discourse. American authorities succeeded in garnering the support of many elites in Japanese education (e.g., Ministry of Education officials, leading academics), but other educators remained skeptical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:History of Education Quarterly. 2024/11, Vol. 64, Issue 4, p457
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:00182680
  • DOI:10.1017/heq.2024.19
  • Accession Number:181547205
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of History of Education Quarterly is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.