JOURNAL ARTICLE

Easements severed from larger parcel entitled to proximity damages.

  • Published In: Appraisal Journal, 2025, v. 93, n. 2. P. 67 1 of 3

  • Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Blair, Benjamin A. 3 of 3

Abstract

The article discusses recent court decisions regarding real estate and valuation, focusing on the case involving the Foothills Reserve Community in Phoenix, Arizona. The homeowners' association (HOA) sought compensation for the loss of easements and proximity damages after the state condemned common areas to construct the South Mountain Freeway. The Arizona Supreme Court ultimately ruled that homeowners were entitled to proximity damages, affirming that appurtenant easements are considered part of a larger parcel for the purposes of eminent domain. Additionally, the article briefly mentions a title dispute involving Conestoga Mall in Nebraska, highlighting jurisdiction issues related to forcible entry and detainer actions. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Appraisal Journal. 2025/04, Vol. 93, Issue 2, p67
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0003-7087
  • Accession Number:189785467
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Appraisal Journal is the property of Appraisal Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.