Copresent jurisdictions: Spirits, theopolitics, and the rise of Akan spirituality in the United States.
Published In: PoLAR: Political & Legal Anthropology Review, 2024, v. 47, n. 1. P. 76 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Coyle Rosen, Lauren 3 of 3
Abstract
Akan spirituality, originally from Ghana, has risen in popularity in the United States since the 1960s and recently has expanded, as shrine houses grow. Akan spiritualists promote reconnecting to ancestors and spiritualists in Ghana, and they offer spiritual avenues for pursuing healing and justice, particularly for African Americans and other diasporic Africans. This article draws on extensive collaborative ethnographic research with a prominent shrine house in Maryland and its ties to a key shrine in Larteh, Ghana. It foregrounds two elder priestesses, focusing on their spiritual governance and work in the realms of healing, adjudication, policing, and protection. They serve in these ways within their spiritual communities and sometimes alongside or with state institutions, or as an antidote to them. This article advances a new concept called copresent jurisdictions—here, defined as Akan spiritual assemblages of Abosom (exalted spirits), ancestors, priestesses, priests, and spiritualists who operate with their own spiritual laws and authorities within their sacred communities and in relation to state institutions. It argues that these copresent jurisdictions offer alternative pathways of law, politics, spirituality, and justice within the contexts of imperiled democratic orders. Copresent jurisdictions expand current theoretical debates over theopolitics, postjuristocratic transitions, cosmopolitical assemblages, and transnational copresences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:PoLAR: Political & Legal Anthropology Review. 2024/05, Vol. 47, Issue 1, p76
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:History
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:1081-6976
- DOI:10.1111/plar.12568
- Accession Number:177613207
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of PoLAR: Political & Legal Anthropology Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.