JOURNAL ARTICLE

Symbolic laws, de facto abolitions and path dependence: When death penalty policies remain stable.

  • Published In: Howard Journal of Crime & Justice, 2023, v. 62, n. 1. P. 11 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Dudai, Ron 3 of 3

Abstract

There is a growing tendency to perceive the death penalty as always 'on the move', often in a teleological trajectory inevitably leading to universal abolition. This article aims to question this tendency, noting that in many cases death penalty policies remain stable, especially in cases of de facto abolition. Such cases are overlooked in the literature, treated as brief interludes towards full abolition, though in fact they can be enduring and serve important symbolic functions. Informed by the historical‐institutional approach, which rejects teleology in favour of path dependence and contingency, the article focuses on the Israeli case, where since 1967 the death penalty remained a lawful option in military courts with jurisdiction over Palestinians, but never applied. I argue that such remarkable stability is not due to inertia, but an unanticipated result of contingent events and processes leading over time to entrenchment of a 'limbo' arrangement, which constitute intentional, functional, policy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Howard Journal of Crime & Justice. 2023/03, Vol. 62, Issue 1, p11
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:2059-1098
  • DOI:10.1111/hojo.12502
  • Accession Number:162569879
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Howard Journal of Crime & Justice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.