JOURNAL ARTICLE

TWO POLEMICS IN WANT OF A HISTORY: SALLUST AND CICERO.

  • Published In: Acta Classica, 2023, v. 66. P. 94 1 of 3

  • Database: Humanities Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Wilson, Marcus 3 of 3

Abstract

Insight into the characteristics of Roman polemic can be revealed by contextualizing the two invectives transmitted among the works of Sallust alongside Cicero's De optimo genere oratorum. The mutual attempts at character assassination of 'Cicero' and 'Sallust', usually considered of limited value by modern historians and biographers, show up the fault lines between genres (historiography and oratory), between education and entertainment, and between demolishing an opponent's reputation and pairing oneself with him in perpetuity. These fictional defamatory attacks raise the participants to a level of fame analogous to, if not superior to, that of Aeschines and Demosthenes in the Greek rhetorical canon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Acta Classica. 2023/01, Vol. 66, p94
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:00651141
  • DOI:10.1353/acl.2022.a914039
  • Accession Number:174283066
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Acta Classica is the property of Classical Association of South Africa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.