Back

Aspirin loading and coronary no‐reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

  • Published In: European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2024, v. 54, n. 6. P. 1 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Ndrepepa, Gjin; Cassese, Salvatore; Xhepa, Erion; Joner, Michael; Sager, Hendrik B.; Kufner, Sebastian; Laugwitz, Karl‐Ludwig; Schunkert, Heribert; Kastrati, Adnan 3 of 3

Abstract

Background: The association of aspirin loading with the risk of coronary no‐reflow (CNR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been investigated. We assessed the association of aspirin loading before PCI with CNR in patients with AMI. Materials and Methods: This study included 3100 patients with AMI undergoing PCI. Of them, 2812 patients received aspirin loading (a single oral [or chewed] or intravenous dose of 150–300 mg) and 288 patients did not receive aspirin loading before PCI. The primary endpoint was CNR, defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction blood flow grade of <3 after the PCI. Results: CNR occurred in 130 patients: 127 patients in the group with aspirin loading and 3 patients in the group without aspirin loading before PCI (4.5% vs. 1.0%; odds ratio [OR] = 4.50, 95% confidence interval, [1.42–14.21], p = 0.005). After adjustment, the association between aspirin loading and CNR was significant (adjusted OR = 4.49 [1.56–12.92]; p < 0.001). There was no aspirin loading‐by‐P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel) interaction (pint = 0.465) or aspirin loading‐by‐chronic aspirin therapy on admission (pint = 0.977) interaction with respect to the occurrence of CNR after PCI. Chronic low‐dose aspirin therapy on admission was not independently associated with higher risk of CNR after PCI (adjusted OR = 1.06 [0.65–1.72]; p = 0.824). Conclusion: In patients with AMI undergoing PCI, aspirin loading before the PCI procedure at the guideline‐recommended doses was associated with higher odds of developing CNR. However, due to the limited number of events, the findings should be considered as hypothesis generating. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2024/06, Vol. 54, Issue 6, p1
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0014-2972
  • DOI:10.1111/eci.14173
  • Accession Number:177219518
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of European Journal of Clinical Investigation is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.