JOURNAL ARTICLE

Colonial Nostalgia and Heritage in Question: Factors Influencing Concerns of Scottish Bagpiping in Post‐Colonial Hong Kong.

  • Published In: Sociology Compass, 2025, v. 19, n. 5. P. 1 1 of 3

  • Database: Sociology Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Yu, Andrew 3 of 3

Abstract

Bagpiping has a long tradition in Hong Kong that can be traced back to the colonial period under British rule. However, concerns have been raised about the sustainability of bagpiping culture in the post‐colonial era. This study examined demographic and psychological predictors of concerns for the future of bagpiping among 127 Hong Kong pipers through an online survey assessing their demographic details, cultural perceptions, and views on British colonialism. Regression analysis revealed that the full model accounted for 52.5 per cent of the variance in concerns for piping's future. After controlling for demographics, positive views on British colonialism and higher attraction to Scottish culture significantly predicted greater concerns, with views on colonialism having the strongest effect. The findings suggest that cultural attachment factors, particularly those tied to Hong Kong's colonial past, play an important role in pipers' outlook toward the sustainability of the art form. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Sociology Compass. 2025/05, Vol. 19, Issue 5, p1
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:1751-9020
  • DOI:10.1111/soc4.70065
  • Accession Number:185453353
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Sociology Compass is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.