JOURNAL ARTICLE
Affective (counter)publics as a critical concept: rethinking affective publics from the history of Chinese Americans in the Exclusion Era.
Published In: Communication Theory (1050-3293), 2025, v. 35, n. 1. P. 51 1 of 3
Database: Communication Source 2 of 3
Authored By: Dai, Linjie 3 of 3
Abstract
This article critically develops the concept of affective publics by situating it within critiques of Habermas's public sphere theory and examining it through the historical lens of Chinese American experiences during the Exclusion Era. It argues for expanding the concept beyond its common association with networked digital technologies to include pre-digital affective circulations, the role of affective counterpublics shaped by intersectional power dynamics, and the inherent ambiguity and fragility of affective (counter)publics. Using Chinese American diasporic networks and press as examples, the article highlights how affective publics and counterpublics are relational, shaped by race, gender, and power, and how they function both to reproduce and resist social inequalities. Ultimately, it proposes a human-centered, historically grounded, and critically nuanced understanding of affective (counter)publics as vital for analyzing the affective dimensions of politics, identity, and social change.
Additional Information
- Source:Communication Theory (1050-3293). 2025/02, Vol. 35, Issue 1, p51
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:History
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:1050-3293
- DOI:10.1093/ct/qtae024
- Accession Number:182905532
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Communication Theory (1050-3293) is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.