JOURNAL ARTICLE

Preference for Distinct Variants in Learning Sound Correspondences During Dialect Acquisition.

  • Published In: Language & Speech, 2025, v. 68, n. 3. P. 534 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Yu, Xiaoyu; Do, Youngah 3 of 3

Abstract

The article investigates the role of sound similarity in learning sound correspondences (SCs)—systematic phonological relations between cognate sounds—in second dialect acquisition. Using an artificial language learning experiment with native Mandarin speakers learning “artificial dialects” modeled on southern Chinese varieties, the study tested whether learners prefer SCs with similar or distinct phonological variants. Results showed no effect of variant similarity in simple one-to-one SC mappings, but a preference for more distinct variants emerged in complex mapping structures (two-to-one and one-to-two), contingent on the distinct variant surpassing a threshold of phonological distance (at least three featural differences). These findings provide empirical support for the salience hypothesis, suggesting that learners favor salient, sufficiently distinct variants when resolving uncertainty in complex SC patterns, while overall sensitivity to subtle variant differences remains low due to high cross-dialect similarity.

Additional Information

  • Source:Language & Speech. 2025/09, Vol. 68, Issue 3, p534
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Language and Linguistics
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0023-8309
  • DOI:10.1177/00238309241308171
  • Accession Number:187409534
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Language & Speech is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.