Annotating dialogue acts in speech data: Problematic issues and basic dialogue act categories.
Published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2023, v. 28, n. 2. P. 144 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Verdonik, Darinka 3 of 3
Abstract
The aims of this paper are to detect the most problematic issues related to dialogue act annotation in speech corpora and to define basic categories of dialogue acts. I critically examine and test generic schemes that represent different lines of dialogue act annotation: AMI, DART, ISO 24617–2 and SWBD-DAMSL. It is found that the most problematic issues regarding dialogue act annotation are related to the distinction between the semantic and pragmatic meanings of utterances, the annotation of metadiscourse, and the adequacy and informativeness of the tagset. The identified basic dialogue act categories are information providing, information seeking, actions, social acts and metadiscourse. The findings help improve dialogue act annotation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 2023/04, Vol. 28, Issue 2, p144
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Language and Linguistics
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:1384-6655
- DOI:10.1075/ijcl.20165.ver
- Accession Number:163812788
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of International Journal of Corpus Linguistics is the property of John Benjamins Publishing Co. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.