JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Discrimination of Science and Poetry in Humphry Davy's Nitrous Oxide Researches.

  • Published In: Romanticism, 2025, v. 31, n. 1. P. 22 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Birtwhistle, John 3 of 3

Abstract

Humphry Davy's Researches, Chemical and Philosophical; Chiefly Concerning Nitrous Oxide (1800) included descriptions of its inhalation by writers such as Coleridge. Nevertheless, Davy discriminated between scientific and literary discourse and used the key term 'imagination' in a sceptical sense defined by controlled trial in medicine. This essay examines the language of Davy's text on each side of the divide between scientific explanation and subjective experience. His chemical nomenclature is contrasted to the Lyrical Ballads programme for poetic diction. Such specialisation argues against the impression that scientific and poetic intellects were unified at the time, because either not yet differentiated or else fused in a special Romantic crucible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Romanticism. 2025/04, Vol. 31, Issue 1, p22
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Language and Linguistics
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:1354-991X
  • DOI:10.3366/rom.2025.0669
  • Accession Number:184295107
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Romanticism is the property of Edinburgh University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.