JOURNAL ARTICLE

Rhoticity in Singapore English: Variation in authentic speech.

  • Published In: English World-Wide, 2026, v. 47, n. 1. P. 103 1 of 3

  • Database: Communication Source 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Yeo, Cheryl 3 of 3

Abstract

This paper examines the variation in rhoticity in both casual and careful speech of Singaporeans, who are representative of the general population of educated Singapore English (SgE) speakers. This study expands the scope of previous research on rhoticity in SgE, e.g. Tan and Gupta (1992) and Tan (2012), by analysing both language-external and language-internal factors. While earlier studies primarily explored social correlates such as age, gender, ethnicity, and educational level, this research addresses a critical gap by examining phonological environments that condition /r/ realisation. Speech data were drawn from two distinct registers — read-aloud speeches and informal conversations — produced by SgE speakers of varying first language (L1) backgrounds. Statistical modelling identified three significant predictors of /r/ realisation: phonological context, preceding vowel, and dominant language. The findings underscore the unique status of the realised /r/ in SgE and the importance of both stylistic and phonological considerations in its distribution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:English World-Wide. 2026/01, Vol. 47, Issue 1, p103
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Language and Linguistics
  • Publication Date:2026
  • ISSN:0172-8865
  • DOI:10.1075/eww.25040.yeo
  • Accession Number:193252738
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of English World-Wide is the property of John Benjamins Publishing Co. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.