Judicial decision‐making in family court involving children with autism spectrum disorder.

The prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children and adolescents has increased over the past decade. Consequently, the courts and experts are more likely to be exposed to these children whose needs are highly heterogeneous. The present study aims to document judicial decision‐making about children with autism spectrum as well as the parenting recommendations made by experts involved in these cases. There were 104 court decisions reviewed in Quebec over the past ten years. The results show that 85.6% of the decisions included a child custody assessment and that judges are more likely to order primary care to mother (56%). However, shared parenting (27%) and primary care to the father (17%) were also ordered in disputes involving an autistic child. Bivariate analyses revealed that challenges with parental monitoring and supervision were associated with court‐ordered parenting arrangements. The present study revealed that a child custody assessment as well as father custody are more often observed than in the general population. This study highlights the need for further research to shed light on the best interests of children with ASD following the separation of their parents. Key points for the family court community: There is an increase in disputes involving a child with ASD;Use of experts appears to be higher in disputes involving a child with ASD;A vast majority of decisions are consistent with experts' parenting recommendations;No common factor seems to dominate experts' recommendations nor court decisions regarding children with ASD.Father custody appears to be more often ordered for children with ASD compared to the general population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]