JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Bare Island Bird Sanctuary and the Myth of Indigenous Consent: Land Theft and Conservation in British Columbia, 1912–16.

  • Published In: Canadian Historical Review, 2024, v. 105, n. 4. P. 498 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Slobodian, Mayana C. 3 of 3

Abstract

The article focuses on the 1913 campaign by the British Columbia Natural History Society (NHS) and the 1912–16 Royal Commission on Indian Affairs (RCIA) to convert X̱O¸X̱DEȽ (Bare Island), a reserve of the Tsawout and Tseycum First Nations of the W̱SÁNEĆ, into a bird sanctuary. Despite repeated assurances under the Indian Act that Indigenous consent was required, the W̱SÁNEĆ refused to surrender the island, marking the only successful Indigenous rejection of a royal commission decision in British Columbia. In response, provincial and federal governments amended laws to bypass Indigenous consent, ultimately implementing reserve land reductions without approval, exemplifying settler-colonial strategies that subordinated conservation and consent to territorial dispossession. The case illustrates the complex interplay between conservationist groups, settler governments, and Indigenous sovereignty, highlighting ongoing tensions around land rights and the myth of Indigenous consent in Canadian colonial history.

Additional Information

  • Source:Canadian Historical Review. 2024/12, Vol. 105, Issue 4, p498
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Law
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0008-3755
  • DOI:10.3138/chr-2023-0007
  • Accession Number:181526262
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Canadian Historical Review is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.