JOURNAL ARTICLE
Changing interpretations of Ian Smith in the British press, 1980–2007.
Published In: Historical Research, 2025, v. 98, n. 279. P. 105 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Pattenden, Hugh 3 of 3
Abstract
This article examines the evolving reputation of Ian Smith, the former prime minister of Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), in British print media from Zimbabwean independence in 1980 until Smith’s death in 2007, situating this within broader debates on settler colonialism and British attitudes toward empire. Initially condemned for his role in Rhodesia’s Unilateral Declaration of Independence and white minority rule, Smith’s image shifted in the 1990s and 2000s as Zimbabwe’s economic decline and political repression under Robert Mugabe prompted some British commentators, especially on the political right, to reassess Smith more favorably, often contrasting his regime with Mugabe’s. The article highlights how Smith’s continued presence in Zimbabwean politics and media, combined with the unique British cultural affinity for Rhodesia’s white minority, sustained extensive British interest in Zimbabwean affairs well beyond independence. Ultimately, Smith’s legacy in British discourse became intertwined with critiques of Mugabe’s rule, reflecting complex and contested perspectives on colonialism, postcolonial governance, and memory in Britain.
Additional Information
- Source:Historical Research. 2025/02, Vol. 98, Issue 279, p105
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Law
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:0950-3471
- DOI:10.1093/hisres/htae019
- Accession Number:182904923
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Historical Research is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.