JOURNAL ARTICLE
Supreme Court Confirms "Reasonable Time" Filing Requirement Applies to Motions for Relief from Judgment on the Ground that the Judgment Is Void.
Published In: Business Law Today, 2026. P. 15 1 of 3
Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Liu, Kevin 3 of 3
Abstract
The article focuses on a January 20, 2026, unanimous Supreme Court decision clarifying that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1)'s requirement to file Rule 60(b) motions within a "reasonable time" applies to motions seeking relief from allegedly void judgments under Rule 60(b)(4). This ruling resolves a longstanding circuit split where most Circuit Courts had held that no time limit applied to such motions because a void judgment is considered a legal nullity. The Supreme Court rejected this majority view, emphasizing that while voidness cannot be cured by delay, procedural rules still impose reasonable time limits to seek relief, allowing courts to consider case-specific circumstances. The decision highlights the balance between finality in judgments and due process without establishing a fixed deadline for challenging void judgments. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:Business Law Today. 2026/01, p15
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Law
- Publication Date:2026
- ISSN:1059-9436
- Accession Number:191998151
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Business Law Today is the property of American Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.