Back

BOWIE KNIVES MAY BE DANGEROUS AND UNUSUAL -- ARE MACHINEGUNS?

  • Published In: Litigation News, 2026, v. 51, n. 2. P. 17 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: McDonald, Andrea L. 3 of 3

Abstract

The article focuses on a recent U.S. Court of Appeals decision upholding the federal ban on machinegun possession under 18 U.S.C. § 922(o) as constitutional, applying the Supreme Court’s two-step framework from New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen for Second Amendment challenges. The majority opinion found the ban consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of regulating “dangerous and unusual” weapons, while a concurring opinion called for a more nuanced historical inquiry, emphasizing distinctions between possession and manner of carry and cautioning against circular reasoning in defining “unusualness.” The divergent opinions highlight ongoing judicial uncertainty in applying historical analysis to modern firearm regulations, with legal experts predicting continued as-applied challenges to machinegun laws that may yield varied outcomes. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Litigation News. 2026/01, Vol. 51, Issue 2, p17
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Law
  • Publication Date:2026
  • ISSN:0147-9970
  • Accession Number:191917822
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Litigation News is the property of American Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.