Court Excludes AI-Enhanced Videos from Trial Evidence.
Published In: Litigation News, 2024, v. 50, n. 1. P. 4 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: NEWMAN, WILLIAM H. 3 of 3
Abstract
A state court recently declined to admit generative artificial intelligence-enhanced video as trial evidence in the case of Washington v. Puloka. The court ruled that the technology used to enhance the video was not widely accepted in the relevant scientific community. While the decision was supported by leaders of the ABA Litigation Section, they anticipate that courts may eventually accept similar technology in the future as it evolves and gains more acceptance. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:Litigation News. 2024/10, Vol. 50, Issue 1, p4
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Law
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:0147-9970
- Accession Number:182134550
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Litigation News is the property of American Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.