JOURNAL ARTICLE
Rights-Based Legal Considerations for Tuberculosis Isolation Practices in Community Settings in the Postpandemic Era.
Published In: Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2025, v. 231, n. 1. P. 31 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Bonomo, Elizabeth J; Shah, Maunank 3 of 3
Abstract
This article examines the legal and constitutional considerations surrounding tuberculosis (TB) control laws in the United States, focusing on the balance between public health goals and individual rights. It highlights that many state and local TB isolation laws remain outdated and often authorize prolonged or involuntary isolation without clear scientific justification, despite evidence that effective treatment rapidly reduces infectiousness. The article discusses evolving legal standards for imposing restrictions, including due process requirements, and emphasizes the need for laws to reflect modern principles such as using the least restrictive means necessary. It also reviews new evidence-based guidelines from the National Tuberculosis Coalition of America (NTCA) that recommend shorter isolation periods and tailored interventions, urging states to update their laws accordingly to better align with constitutional protections while advancing TB elimination efforts.
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2025/01, Vol. 231, Issue 1, p31
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Law
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:0022-1899
- DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiae479
- Accession Number:182798579
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Infectious Diseases is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.