JOURNAL ARTICLE

Arbitration Clauses May Not Preclude Courts from Adjudicating Monopoly Civil Disputes.

  • Published In: GRUR International: Journal of European & International IP Law, 2025, v. 74, n. 3. P. 286 1 of 2

  • Database: Legal Source 2 of 2

Abstract

The article discusses a legal case involving a dispute between X Tan, a vegetable wholesaler, and Ma X Dui Company over alleged abuse of a dominant market position. Despite arbitration clauses in their contracts, the court ruled that the case should be heard in court due to its broader implications on market competition and consumer interests. The court overturned the original judgment and ordered a new trial to address the monopoly-related issues. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:GRUR International: Journal of European & International IP Law. 2025/03, Vol. 74, Issue 3, p286
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Law
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:26328550
  • DOI:10.1093/grurint/ikaf002
  • Accession Number:184297510
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of GRUR International: Journal of European & International IP Law is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.