JOURNAL ARTICLE

Asymmetric relations and systemic misperceptions: Why and how Australia and China talk past each other.

  • Published In: International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2025, v. 25, n. 1. P. 39 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Pan, Guangyi 3 of 3

Abstract

This article analyzes the recent tensions between Australia and China through the lens of asymmetric theory, emphasizing how disparities in power, strategic priorities, and perceptions contribute to mutual misinterpretations. China, as a rising global power, focuses primarily on its great power competition with the United States and global ambitions, often overlooking Australia's regional security concerns and desire for strategic autonomy. Conversely, Australia, a middle power in the Indo-Pacific, is highly sensitive to China's regional assertiveness and perceives Beijing's actions as direct threats, partly due to its close alliance with the U.S. This asymmetry in attention and priorities fuels a cycle of mistrust, with China viewing Australia as a U.S. proxy and Australia fearing China's expansionism, complicating efforts toward rapprochement despite strong economic interdependence. The article advances asymmetric theory by explaining how differing focal points at global and regional levels underpin the persistent misperceptions and strategic dilemmas in Australia–China relations.

Additional Information

  • Source:International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2025/01, Vol. 25, Issue 1, p39
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Law
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:1470-482X
  • DOI:10.1093/irap/lcae009
  • Accession Number:182369446
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of International Relations of the Asia-Pacific is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.