Qualifying an Expert Witness.
Published In: GPSolo, 2024, v. 41, n. 3. P. 39 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Werkmeister, H. Nicole 3 of 3
Abstract
Expert witnesses play a crucial role in legal proceedings by providing specialized knowledge to help judges and juries understand complex issues. Before testifying in court, expert witnesses must undergo a rigorous qualification process to ensure the reliability and relevance of their testimony. This process is shaped by seminal cases such as Frye v. United States and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, as well as Federal Rule of Evidence 702. Voir dire is the procedure by which a lawyer qualifies an expert witness at trial, and the lawyer must establish the expert's background, training, and skills. The admissibility of expert testimony depends on its relevance, basis in sufficient facts or data, reliability of principles and methods, and reliable application of these principles and methods. The qualification of expert witnesses is crucial to maintaining fairness and impartiality in the judicial process. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:GPSolo. 2024/05, Vol. 41, Issue 3, p39
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Law
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:1528-638X
- Accession Number:177955143
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of GPSolo is the property of American Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.