JOURNAL ARTICLE
THE KGB AND GLASNOST: A CONTRADICTION IN TERMS?
Published In: Demokratizatsiya, 2023, v. 31, n. 1. P. 57 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: SANSHIRO HOSAKA 3 of 3
Abstract
Why did the KGB and its successor agencies remain popular in post-Communist Russia? How did the Soviet security agencies manage to cope with the tides of demokratizatsiya and glasnost during perestroika-"presumably unprecedented challenges for the clandestine political police? A previously classified in-house journal, KGB Sbornik, offers unique insight into how the KGB adapted its work to the demands for openness and transparency. By implementing a range of self-reforms and deceptions, Chekists successfully forestalled the external reformist discourse and became hidden champions of glasnost. Multiple methods of manipulating domestic audiences in post-Soviet Russian politics have their roots in the Chekist school. The findings suggest that in a non-democratic regime, intelligence agencies may be not static, but highly proactive, constantly reflecting on democratic changes in state and society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Demokratizatsiya. 2023/01, Vol. 31, Issue 1, p57
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Law
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:1074-6846
- Accession Number:161572028
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Demokratizatsiya is the property of Elliott School of International Affairs and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.