JOURNAL ARTICLE
Drug Legalization, Democracy and Public Health: Canadian Stakeholders' Opinions and Values with Respect to the Legalization of Cannabis.
Published In: Public Health Ethics, 2023, v. 16, n. 2. P. 175 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Rochette, Marianne; Valiquette, Matthew; Barned, Claudia; Racine, Eric 3 of 3
Abstract
This article presents a qualitative exploratory study examining the opinions and values of three Canadian stakeholder groups—people with lived experience of addiction, clinicians experienced in addiction treatment, and members of the general public—regarding the legalization of cannabis in Canada. Conducted through 48 semi-structured interviews shortly after the enactment of the Cannabis Act in 2018, the study found that while most participants favored legalization, their reasons varied: clinicians emphasized health risks and addiction potential, people with lived experience highlighted personal autonomy and the need for quality information, and the public focused on the impact of addiction on others. The research underscores the complexity of democratic public health debates, noting tensions between harm-reduction and de-normalization approaches, the role of scientific evidence intertwined with values, and the importance of including diverse experiential perspectives in policy discussions. Limitations include the study's sample size and timing prior to the legalization of cannabis edibles, but the findings contribute to understanding stakeholder diversity in attitudes toward cannabis legalization in Canada.
Additional Information
- Source:Public Health Ethics. 2023/07, Vol. 16, Issue 2, p175
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Law
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:1754-9973
- DOI:10.1093/phe/phad016
- Accession Number:169792584
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Public Health Ethics is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.